html Difference between Toronto Bridge and All on 4: complete table
SD SanitadentalClinic · Tirana

Difference between Toronto Bridge and All on 4: which one to choose

Flange or not, resin or ceramic, 4 or more implants: the real differences between the two fixed rehabilitations, with comparative table and prices.

Toronto Bridge and All on 4 are often confused, and not surprisingly: both rehabilitate an entire arch with one fixed prosthesis screwed onto implants. But they are not the same thing: All on 4 is a implant protocol (4 implants, the posterior ones inclined), while Toronto Bridge is a type of prosthesis (titanium structure with resin flange). In this guide we put things in order with a complete comparison table: aesthetics, hygiene, duration and cost.

Toronto Bridge: titanium bar prosthesis
Toronto Bridge: titanium bar prosthesis

The distinction that clarifies everything

All on 4 indicates the surgical technique: four implants per arch, the two rear ones inclined to exploit the available bone and avoid grafts. A Toronto Bridge (prosthesis with resin flange) or a ceramic prosthesis without flange can be screwed onto these 4 implants.

Toronto Bridge indicates the prosthesis: titanium frame, resin/composite teeth, pink artificial gum (flange) covering the area where the bone and gum have receded. It can be fixed on 4 implants (All on 4), on 6 (All on 6) or with a bar.

So the correct question is not “Toronto or All on 4" but: "how many implants are needed in my case, and what type of prosthesis do we screw onto them?". Learn more about the two techniques on the pages Toronto Bridge e All on 4.

Complete comparison table

FeatureToronto Bridge (with flange, resin)All on 4/6 ceramic prosthesis (without flange)
Implants4 or 64 or 6 (requires more bone for the flangeless version)
Artificial gingiva (flange)Yes: it covers bone and gum recessionNo: you need sufficient bone/gingiva or reconstruction
Teeth materialResin/composite (more elastic, wears out sooner)Ceramic/zirconium (more aesthetic and wear-resistant)
AestheticsExcellent; the flange solves "long" smilesExcellent if the fabrics are adequate
Home hygieneWater flosser and pipe cleaners under the flangeSimilar to natural teeth, superfloss floss
ReparabilityEasy and economical in the laboratoryMore complex and expensive repairs
Wear over timeRelining or replacing teeth after 5-10 yearsMinimal wear, longer life of the product
Average cost in Italy (arch)€8.000 – €15.000€10.000 – €18.000
From Sanitadental Clinic (arch)from €2,800 to €4,500, depending on the casefrom €3,500 to €4,500, depending on the case

Italian prices = indicative market averages; our quote is written, signed and blocked for 30 days.

When the flange is an advantage (not a defect)

After years of edentulism or periodontal disease, the bone and gums recede: a "teeth only" prosthesis would result in very long and unsightly teeth. The pink resin flange of Toronto reconstructs the gingival profile and restores natural proportions to the smile and lips — often with an aesthetic support effect on the lower third of the face that patients greatly appreciate.

For this reason, in the event of a marked reabsorption, the Toronto Bridge is not the "economic choice": it is the technically correct choice. Ceramic without flange, on the other hand, is ideal when the tissues are well preserved.

Hygiene and maintenance compared

With the Toronto the cleaning passes below the prosthesis: daily water flosser, pipe cleaners, superfloss thread. It's simple but must be done consistently. With ceramic without flange, cleaning is more similar to that of natural teeth.

In both cases they are useful professional checks 1-2 times a year with removal of the prosthesis (the Toronto is easily unscrewed) and professional hygiene. The resin can be restored in the laboratory at little expense; ceramic lasts longer but, if chipped, it costs more to repair.

Which one to choose: the clinical criteria

The choice comes from the CT scan and tissue examination: marked bone resorption → Toronto with flange; well-preserved fabrics and maximum aesthetic request → ceramic without flange; poor posterior bone → 4 inclined systems; good bone and high forces → 6 systems. We present both options when appropriate, with prices and future maintenance written in black and white. Request a free x-ray evaluation from the page contacts — and remember that the expense is tax deductible in Italy.

All-on-4: full arch on four implants
All-on-4: full arch on four implants

Frequently asked questions

Are Toronto Bridge and All on 4 the same thing?

No. All on 4 is the surgical protocol (4 implants, posterior inclined); Toronto Bridge is the type of prosthesis (titanium + resin with flange). They are often combined: a Toronto Bridge screwed onto 4 implants. But a ceramic prosthesis can also be screwed onto an All on 4.

Does Toronto resin deteriorate quickly?

It wears out more than ceramic, it's true: for this reason we expect a relining or replacement of the resin teeth after 5-10 years. It is a quick and economical laboratory intervention, already foreseen in the maintenance plan that we deliver with the estimate.

Which one costs less between the two?

The flange Toronto has the lowest cost, because the resin and titanium frame require less laboratory work than an all-ceramic structure. With us the difference between the two options is however limited and is quoted in writing in the quote.

Do you feel covered with Toronto?

No: in upper Toronto the palate remains free, unlike dentures. The flange covers only the anterior gum area. Taste, phonetics and thermal sensitivity remain natural.

Can I start with a Toronto and move on to ceramics later?

It is possible but it is best to decide immediately: changing the type of prosthesis means redoing the product. Our approach is to evaluate both options at first planning, with comparable present and future costs, so you only choose once.

Your free quote awaits you

Send your x-ray on WhatsApp: written and signed quote within 24 hours, free and without obligation.

Free quote on WhatsApp
Call now WhatsApp